Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | otabdeveloper4's commentslogin

> If you have a well secured LAN where trust is social SSH gets you nothing.

Unless you're doing automatic and mandatory SSH key rotation (which almost nobody ever does) then SSH is just "password on a sticker next to the monitor" with a long password.


> Are there technical reasons that Rust took off and D didn't?

Yes. D tried to jump on the "systems programming with garbage collection" dead horse, with predictable results.

(People who want that sort of stupidity already have Go and Java, they don't need D.)


Go wasn't around when D was released and Java has for the longest time been quite horrible (I first learnt it before diamond inference was a thing, but leaving that aside it's been overly verbose and awkward until relatively recently).

Is Java even a "systems programming" language?

I don't even know what that term means anymore; but afaik Java didn't really have reliable low-level APIs until recently.


Depends if one considers writing compilers, linkers, JITs, database engines, and running bare metal on embedded real time systems "systems programming".

so, "yes", but with added sarcasm? :D

> (People who want that sort of stupidity already have Go and Java, they don't need D.)

Go wasn't around when D was created, and Java was an unbelievable memory hog, with execution speeds that could only be described as "glacial".

As an example, using my 2001 desktop, the `ls` program at the time was a few kb, needed about the same in runtime RAM and started up and completed execution in under 100ms.

The almost equivalent Java program I wrote in 2001 to list files (with `ls` options) took over 5s just to start up and chewed through about 16MB of RAM (around 1/4 of my system's RAM).

Java was a non-starter at the time D came out - the difference in execution speed between C++ systems programs and Java systems programs felt, to me (i.e. my perception), larger than the current difference in performance between C++/C/Rust programs and Bash shell scripts.


That's too bad.

It's Emacs. Also Emacs is an IDE.

Yeah, it's not clear to me why my iPhone keyboard does that but I didn't correct it. Indeed, emacs is love, emacs is life. Emacs is all things. Emacs is nothing and everything.

https://imgur.com/a/PNR99un


The whole point of "AI" in the first place is that it just vibes and doesn't need an instruction manual!

If "learn to hold it not wrong" is your message, then the AI bubble will be popping very soon.


How is that the point of AI. The point is that it can chug through things that would take humans hours in a matter of seconds. You still have to work with it. But it reduces huge tasks into very small ones

No, the point of AI is to fire your employees and replace them with "agents".

This implies that the managers managing your "agents" can be literal assclowns hired for pennies.


But then you'd have to code review that crap and write test harnesses and other shit.

Sounds like a lot more work tbh.


Assign the PR to the offshore team and then just forget about it when they never end up reviewing it?

It helps sell the transhumanism scam and keep the money train rolling.

For a while at least.


You can rent a GPU server and run your own Qwen models.

It's 90 percent the same thing as Claude but with flat-rate costs.


> as i’m learning how to prompt well

Prompting isn't a real skill and you're not learning anything.

"Claude 4.5 Sonnet operator" is not a job description.


I’m finding fewer and fewer people that need convincing that there’s some value in coding agents and prompting skills at this point. To the point where my reply to this is quite simple;

You’ve been left behind and at this very late point in the game i feel no obligation to even try to convince you.


> there’s some value in coding agents

Sure. There's always some value.

> ...and prompting skills

"Prompting" is not a skill. Put it another way: there's no reason for an employer to pay you a salary for "prompting", because "prompting" is something that literally everyone can do.


Left behind in regards to _what_? The "optimal" workflow for these things seems to be changing every week.

> just use psychological tricks on the LLM, bro, you'll cajole it into not hallucinating

Can't help but chuckle at that.


If it sounds stupid but it works, it's not stupid.

> but it works

Proofs?


Try it yourself and report back the results.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: