Hey all! I've been working on this on-and-off for a few months, but it is sort of in a broken state right now on GitHub. I'm playing with some modifications to the charts and dependency graph, and the localStorage autosave/load is a bit glitchy.
Just saw Dan posted it now, and figured I should chime in (and push my last few commits).
Actually, Stanford does essentially pay students to go. Each undergraduate student costs Stanford about twice as much as they pay in tuition. This is typically the case at elite colleges, which is why they spend so much time seeking donations from alumni.
(Also, the vast majority of students don't pay full tuition anyway because of the extensive financial aid systems at these schools.)
That can't be right. First, your Delta study is woefully lacking in school - specific information. Second, the college confidential link's methodology seems to be missing a lot to me, particularly in the way of revenue. For example, for many universities (eg UPenn) the parking department is actually a huge revenue driver that must be taken into account to calculate overall university P&L, and that kind of thing is completely ignored here. Schools are businesses; you can't just ignore the other sources of revenue. As such, those estimates are hugely over inflated. Is Yale really spending $100k PER STUDENT each year? How could that possibly be?
Let's look at Stanford. Wolfram Alpha claims 6532 undergrads, $37380 tuition per year. If student cost was truly double tuition, Stanford would be operating at a loss of $244.4MM per year, and (all other considerations aside) the $12.6BB endowment would be gone in 50 years.
Ultimately, the reported cost is often based on some key assumptions that aren't always stated, and I'm pretty sure we as a population don't actually have much clarity on the true cost of educating a student, if it's even possible to really quantify such a thing (try measuring the monetary cost of creating a supportive environment or a caring teacher).
I'm not sure why you find this so a priori implausible.
You're right that the CC link misses revenue sources -- but isn't that the point? Stanford seems to be using money from non-student revenue sources to subsidize a majority of per-student expenses. (That is, students are getting "paid.")
Or are you assuming that all that other revenue still comes from students (e.g. parking), or directly from an unchanging endowment? Stanford raises hundreds of millions of dollars in donations from people who aren't students every year, more than enough to cover that $244.4m shortfall directly. Direct income from students is only a small part of the overall university budget: http://facts.stanford.edu/administration/finances
Anyway, I'm only making a factual spending claim here. I make no claim about the effectiveness of the spending in educating students -- that's a separate issue.
My team built something similar at a recent hackathon. It attempts to automatically do this to an arbitrary WAV file (break up into waveforms) and generate a new piece of music:
https://github.com/osnr/markov-music
Just saw Dan posted it now, and figured I should chime in (and push my last few commits).
The version here works the OK-est, but it still needs work: http://www.omarrizwan.com/cruncher/
Hoping to get back to it sometime within the next few weeks.