Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | origamirobot's commentslogin

I literally got an email yesterday from Amazon recruiters with the subject line "Tired of recruiters who never give up?"


I hope you responded to that one!


Good, maybe their annoying recruiters will stop sending me emails.


Strange that that happens to me is, every time I take out my Airpods and put them in their case, I get a Find My alert on my phone saying I left them behind even though they're in my pocket.


I was looking for this also and couldn't find it.


It's set to private. I can't see anything on this link.


"If you wish to make apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe" - Carl Sagan


I have a QNAP NAS device with a bunch of storage. PPoE gigabit switch. A few ReoLink hardwired cameras pointed at all the entrances to my house. My QNAP device has a free NVR app that detects the cameras on the network and saves the recordings to the NAS. It's pretty simple and I don't have to worry about shady cloud-based devices.


Sounds like you need a buffer. A person who's job it is to keep everyone away from you while that person records what everyone needs and presents it to you at specific times.


That, and proper internal documentation. And if that exists, encourage people to use it.

Usually when a single person is swamped with questions by co-workers, this will be because the information isn't properly documented in some sort of internal repository.

Wouldn't be the first time I've heard it argued that this takes too much time to implement.

I'd argue that it takes far less time than fielding all those questions manually.


That's actually a really good point. Internal documentation is severely lacking. Encouraging people to submit more questions by mail/chat would probably make it easier to build up an internal knowledge base (in the sense that I can copy/paste those questions & answers as a starting point).


Kindof like a private stackoverflow... or something else...

I've tried Confluence but without strict adherence to a set of internal rules, that can easily become a mess.


Also if the internal docs didnt work out for them they should probably update it once they figure out how to make it work.


Indeed.

My first question in these situations is: why didn't they go for the internal documentation? And if they did, why isn't that good enough?


FWIW to expand: I am that person in my company. My title is "Technical Lead" and my job as I eventually discovered is just to be "chief enabler" for the team of engineers under me, and a "crap umbrella" - to keep crap from coming down on my team directly.

My company originally wanted me to micromanage and direct everything, but I've found that real leadership is when you can give smart engineers autonomy and entrust them to build and execute a plan. I am there when they need me and can jump in as needed if they get in over their heads.


Well put. I'm also a tech lead and have been through a similar journey. I felt like I was a bad leader as I wasn't micro-managing (deliberately of course!). In my company there are a few senior people who seem to think the best leaders need to have big egos and make the decisions, micro-manage and keep tabs on people but the results and team happiness when leading without ego and being an enabler says otherwise!


So basically an assistant. How a developer can afford an assistant?


It's called a project manager. One of the tasks of a PM is to make sure that the devs have time to do their work and manage any incoming information before relaying it to them.

Is this an emergency? Interrupt them. Is this a minor inconvenience? Could this be talked about in the daily tomorrow morning? Is it something that someone else should actually know about? Block the information from the devs and deal with it in the chosen way.


Sometimes PMs don't do that and don't chastise the dev for not getting work done because they understand they're being interrupted. Then the dev is in a poor position where they want to do focused work but can't.


An assistant/secretary is what a project manager is supposed to be. The title is wrong in that it makes everybody think they are supposed to be a manager, a source of many problems in our line of work.

Edit: to answer your question about affording one, it seems around 5 developers can share one secretary, and split the cost. Incidentally, this is a usual setup with a PM as well, but again, they often seem to think their job is to manage the developers, not the project (which they also often don't do).


I spend the time between compiling my code learning Rubik's cubes. I have the 2x2 and 3x3 algorithms memorized. I started learning 4x4 recently.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: