Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mykowebhn's commentslogin

A Kazakh city in the eastern part of the country, near the border with Xinjiang. That's Almaty, right?

No. I would have mentioned Almaty as it's big enough so that at least some people would have heard about it. I'm in this dump:

https://aqicn.org/station/@517492/

Almaty also has terrible air quality, but looking both at averages and extremes, it's about 3-4 times cleaner than this place.

As I said, it currently looks okay due to some wind, but it's a short abnormality and the first relatively clean "window" for the past ten days. Look at this station's history and you'll see conditions more typical for this region.

Even historical data shows "only" 310 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but this is also misleading. The new network includes 26 more accurate stations spread all over the city, but the public portal for these data is being worked on. Hopefully next time this subject comes up on HN I'll have something to link to.

Several of the nearby stations are simply not working and always show zero.

All I'm trying to say is that using IQAir data to rank anything global is exceedingly misleaing.


A few years before Covid, I was driving to work in San Francisco and I stopped at a Philz Coffee in Marin County, as I often did. It was a usual workday morning and everyone was looking down at their phones while waiting for their coffee. We were all preoccupied and eager to get to work.

All of a sudden, some guy who looked to be in his 20s comes in clearly not from the area. He was dressed like a backpacker and he seemed lost. He was studying the coffee menu and saying hi to those around him. His friendliness and being-in-the-moment-ness really touched me, helped to pull me out of myself. When I went to pay for my coffee, I told the cashier that I was going to pay for his coffee as well. While I was still waiting for my coffee, he went to pay and learned that I had already paid for his coffee. I was embarrassed, but I will never forget the look of appreciation on his face.


I feel like the title should read: "If an Meta AI model can read a brain-wide signal, why couldn't the brain?"

"Wouldn't" suggests that the brain is choosing not to. I'm not sure this is the case here.


“Wouldn't” is being used in the logical-conditional sense, not in the sense of willingness, requesting, nor opinion.

It's literally “What's the reason that the machinery of the brain doesn't use this mechanism, given this proof that the effect could in principle be used?”. A similar question can be made for quantum mechanical interference in the brain (which to be clear I feel is adequately answered by “the brain is a wildly inappropriate vehicle for harnessing interference effects).


Using your explanation, let me try this on an example, say the extinction event that killed off many dinosaur species.

If some mammalian species were able to survive this extinction event and subsequently flourish, why wouldn't dinosaur species?

Not sure that works for me. I'd put "couldn't".


It may not work for you, but you're literally arguing with the dictionary here.


A couple of Youtubers who are also round-the-world travelers whom I enjoy watching, one a Dutch motorcyclist and the other a German cyclist.

Noraly, the motorcyclist, has already traveled through South and North America, Africa, and Asia, some multiple times. Currently, I believe she is in Tajikistan about to enter Kyrgystan.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEIs9nkveW9WmYtsOcJBwTg

Max Roving, the cyclist, has already cycled through Afghanistan and he is currently trying to ride Africa north to south. He just completed Algeria and is about to enter Morroco.

https://www.youtube.com/@MaxRoving


There is nothing so wonderful that it cannot be ruined by turning it into a youtube channel... The really brilliant people I've met doing things like this always absolutely refused to mediafy their experience. Turning your adventure into a continuous TV show is great way to kill the adventure. We're now so used to everyone running their own shopping channel we don't even notice it. Read Thesiger's books for an account of real experience. The film I urge everyone to watch is Cronenberg's Videodrome - truly the film of our times.


I’ve met some really brilliant people who only finished the challenges they gave themselves because they had a community’s encouragement.

Seems to me you might want to relax your filters a bit and meet some of the other brilliant people.


I think the central message of that article is precisely that he is completing the adventure only because of community encouragement - but that that is the assistance of all the incredible people he met along the way, strangers on the ground who supported him and helped him on his way, and his friends and family at home. The community is the real people on the ground, and it is the real and living community of the humans who inhabit the entire world. The commercial transmissions with you as TV star are totally unnecessary, and actually only get in the way... Thesiger said that the greatest thing about his adventure across the Arabian Desert was his comradeship with the Bedouin. You just can't have that while waiving a selfie-stick and grinning into the camera...


There are incredible people along the way, there are also incredible people watching and cheering on people who vlog. Communities can — and very much should — be much larger than just who you happen to have found yourself physically near.

And yes, I can assure you, you can absolutely have both while engaging in blogging, vlogging, serialized writing, or any other form of serialized expression.

Not all of vlogging has any relationship to your straw man.


I can only say that, in my own experience, you can't. Traveling pre- and post-smartphone are two completely different realities. The thing tethering you to a gigantic global faceless 'community' has the cost of weakening or blocking your engagement with real immediate physical people, and chance events and immediate experience. There is definitely a trade-off, no matter where your preferences lie. The last time I stayed in a hostel it was in Lima, Peru. It was mostly young people traveling. On every bunk in the room, a guest staring silently into their glowing palms. The joy of traveling used to be having very intense and focused encounters with completely new people who you would probably never speak to again...


Interesting… I’ve been all over the planet, and in none of the really interesting, out there places have I ever seen someone looking at an obscure travel vlog about interesting, out there places.

I have seen a lot of people consumed by the algorithms of very uninteresting, in there places. The places I go to to see people consumed by travel vlogs.

Your problem isn’t with the people creating social media, your problem is with the people advertising on it.


"There is definitely a trade-off, no matter where your preferences lie."

That's a much more reasonable position than the idea that sharing your journey on Youtube "ruins" it, or "kills the adventure". Different people prefer different things.


It depends. I find those interesting to watch.


And they've been very safe, as far as I've heard. I think generally you can use common sense and be extremely safe all around the world.

Unfortunately there are some exceptions and I believe the highest risk area is India. A lady vlogger on motorcycle was recently gang raped there by 7 men.


With extra danger due to sharing your location online all the time.


I assume this is mitigated by delaying the uploads by a month (which you may need anyway due to sporadic internet access & not always having the time to edit videos).


Off topic but related to your comment,

Noraly/Itchy boots rubs me the wrong way far too often. Her content always **ends up being top notch and respectful**, but starts off with a sour taste after the title is "I should have never come here." and the content is a lovely journey......

Idk. This whole genre is: western person is achieving a "dream" life as a function of their birth and wealth status. Has a good time, seemed to enjoy the journey. But then pretends the trips are hampered by 1-2 (expected) events not normal for a westerner, and reflects that in the title for views.

I think the effect is more negative than not.


There's also this couple, each has their own channel, who are filming their walk from England to Vietnam.

https://www.youtube.com/@chubbytrekka

https://www.youtube.com/@SophieTangTravels


I also enjoy watching Charles, a French-Canadian cyclist currently cycling from Canada to Europe. As a geologist he regularly explains rock formations and rock types he encounters.

https://www.youtube.com/c/Charlesenv%C3%A9lo


> currently cycling from Canada to Europe.

Isn't there, like, the ocean? Or does he go the Karl Bushby way over the Bering Strait?


There is also AussieEspañol, who is attempting to travel from Argentina to Alaska in a tuk-tuk (an auto rickshaw) - https://www.youtube.com/@aussieespanol/videos

Followed him a bit last year. A really sweet and enthusiastic person.


There's also Ed Pratt who does round-the-world expeditions by unicycle

https://www.youtube.com/@EdPratt


If someone didn't know their Star Wars, I'd run the other way too


I've not seen any of the Star Wars franchise. Its never interested me.



The non-biological term would be "billionaire".


The non-biological term would be "publicly-traded corporation". If anything their behavior is worse when there is no controlling founder.


This thread is an exaggeration. Disney could have operated Micky Mouse themed casinos on its premises with probable success, it could also lobby to change regulation that is associated with that.

However companies have balancing factors which are other than maximizing short term profits, such as moral image


[flagged]


maybe these tech companies do not subscribe to your notion of modern day gestapo (an organization that was involved in killing 10+ million people in horrible ways) or a "genocide" that is minuscule in comparison to american bombings in Japan, which were similarly in the context of war and actually targeted civilians

Maybe your use of these hyperboles are just an artifact of speech deficiencies of our social media engineered reality?





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: