Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | metabagel's commentslogin

I can’t take any of it seriously.

If you’re really studying film, there is a lot to pay attention to in every scene. If you’re just watching films to be entertained, then yes, older movies have a slower pace and can sometimes be boring.

I think a film student would often be asking themselves why it was shot that way and what they might do differently.


There's little assurance of safety or 'fitness for purpose' for apps in the App Store. Apple takes 30% for distribution, and you're basically on your own.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-betrayed-trust-says-iph...


I think that spammers would happily pay that rate.

Today out of curiosity, I tried looking at what is the cost of one PVA (Pre-verified account) of google. I found it to be around ~$0.03 (3 cents) or it could be an amazon account idk or maybe an youtube account

Like my point is that atleast for amazon/yt, these bots usually cost this much ~$0.03 to buy once.

Then we probably see a scammer buy many of these accounts and then (rent it?) on their own website/telegram groups to promtoe views/ratings etc./ comment with the porn ridden bots that we saw on youtube who will copy any previous comment and paste it and so on.

So technically these still cost 3 cents & scammers are happily paying the rate.


Charlie Brown is a child.


Surprised I had to read this far down the thread to find this comment.


Sorta. The whole point of the strip is that they don't talk or act like children.

"Schultz" is German for "brown". He's very much the author's adult POV, using a child-looking character to disarm the cynicism.


Brown in German is actually, wait for it, "braun".


Schultz actually is not German for brown. It's a name deriving from the name of a kind of medieval tax official.


> "Schultz" is German for "brown".

Beleg fehlt.


Yes, equanimity is a great quality to possess. It means that you never get too high or too low. When things are really going your way, you know that things can change for the worse. Yet you can be content. When things are not going your way, you know that things can change for the better. And you can be content.

This doesn't mean that you don't try to achieve anything. It means that you can still be content whether you succeed or fail.

Thank you for reminding me about this word.


No problem! Happy it was helpful. I learned about equanimity last year in a book I read about the science of self actualization, how to reach your unique potential.

https://scottbarrykaufman.com/books/transcend/

cheers


> some people in tech companies will identify people like me and wring us out in ways that only benefit them

Absolutely. They inevitably get promoted to managers, because they are able to parasitically get things done.


How does this relate to the SOLID project?

https://solidproject.org/


I'd say some of the worldview is shared but the architecture and ethos is very different. Some major differences:

- AT tries to solve aggregation of public data first. I.e. it has to be able to express modern social media. Bluesky is a proof that it would work in production. AFAIK, Solid doesn't try to solve aggregation, and is focused on private data first. (AT plans private data support but not now.)

- AT embraces "apps describe on their own formats" (Lexicons). Solid uses RDF which is a very different model. My impression is RDF may be more powerful but is a lot more abstract. Lexicon is more or less like *.d.ts for JSON.


Trump wants to acquire Greenland and rent it back to the Greenlanders.


They’re not occupying forces. There is a status of forces agreement between the two countries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_forces_agreement


You are right. But it's a matter of perspective. In the mainstream perspective those bases are based on contracts and a method of mutual security. But there is indeed also the perspective in Germany that those bases are factually occupying forces and given their history the option of having those bases removed have been limited.

And there is a kernel of truth in it. The USA likely wouldn't give up Ramstein under any circumstances safe the German military mobilizing against them, the base is (was?) too important for the US. When Trump invades Greenland we will see this play out (how the base stays active and Germany is powerless to stop that).


So the occupier and country occupied signed an legal agreement making the occupation officially legal?

De facto and de jure are two very, very different things...

(not saying the US forces are occupying Germany, just commenting on op's logic)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: