I'm unable to believe that anyone running a product with over a billion active users has anything less than altruistic intentions. Who is to say any of us have free will? Who is to say any of us deserve free will after all the wars we've caused and damage to the environment? If your going to get theological don't bother, you are out of date.
Stretch your mind, try to take something really hard and don't be afraid to fail. One dropped class or an F or even a GPA below 3.0 isn't going to ruin your entire life or career, most sane companies don't even check GPA. I missed out on math and physics, I wish I had taken the advanced classes like differential equations. There was also a fluid dynamics class that sounded cool. As far as electives, I hated taking them. Now I just wish I could take another art class or reading class and give more purpose to the activity. I also took Religions of the World and that gave me a basic understanding of other people's belief systems that has a small impact on my friendship with multinational friends. Such as not eating a cheese burger in front of Indians. And not being offended when someone from the middle East doesn't want to eat in front of me. High school history class also sucked, so rather than being discouraged to take a history elective in college, I wish I would have taken one. You need all of these topics to enjoy society.
Forgot to mention. I have used math professionally at a medical company I worked for. You will need it if you ever plan on exploring big data or AI or even usual algorithms. I avoided math in college because it was hard and that's a mistaken mindset.
I took a bunch of advanced classes at a top five school (physics minor, for example). Even my grad research was in a related field. I learned that what I was taught was historic and that most people don't get to work with equations anyways.
I wish I had instead spent the time hanging out with friends...
I think about that a lot. If I applied the same work ethic that I have now to school, I would probably be way smarter. Perseverance is hard to learn. At the education company I worked for we proved that there is enough time to study 3 hours outside of class per credit hour and still work and have free time. It just takes time management and a daily calendar to find that balance.
Well, if I choose CS, I'll really want to do the cool stuff (AI/data science). Our university offers something like AI Master's, so the required Math background will be (hopefully) provided. I skimmed the study-plan for the General CS bachelor's, and there's bunch of linear algebra, discrete mathematics and combinatorics classes.
Cygwin still seems to be the go-to for any POSIX apps that need to interact with the actual Windows environment. For example, wslbridge[1] that connects wsltty[2] to WSL compiles the frontend component under cygwin.
I was expressing my excitement over something neat which implicitly answers the query in the title that it was designed for me. People who think wave analysis is neat. There are at least 3 other posts on here describing the basic features of wave analysis are just fine. Thanks for the down votes!
Doesn't science also apply to science? We should be sciencing our science which means being skeptical of all conclusions, even your own. I feel your stress. I use to even call myself a scientist, and regard myself as a scientist, but then I realized 90% of my work is entirely unmeasured and there is no sense of effectiveness of the remaining 10% that actually makes it to production.
I think we need a lot more focus and funding on a field of study/discipline that studies how science it done. I'm not honestly sure who in the academy, if anyone, is doing this. "History of science" comes close (it's not always "in the past"), but generally scrupulously avoids making any determinations of the "validity" of the science, it tends to be like a _social_ study of how science it done, intentionally having no opinions on how to make it "better" or "worse".
Are there any departments or disciplines or academic careers that can be made on scrupulous scientific study of how science goes right and wrong, including statistical as well as other issues? I think we need it.
