Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | feeela's commentslogin

You usually want people who are A) do actually buy something and B) attend in actual social interactions (i.e. talking to each other).

Rent an office or go to one of those shared office spaces, they do offer coffee too.


A stochastic parrot.


your brain is a stochastic parrot


This seems to be highly focused on global financial news, which are unsignificant to most people on this planet. It would be nice to be able to include or exclude certain news-categories to actually produce a list that has some significance to the reader.


I'm guessing the Arithmetic to maximising significance to population favours economics because 10 cents for every Indian outweighs 300 dead in a train crash several times over.


Indeed. The perfect news feed has to be tailored to the reader. For instance, events in my city have rather large impact on me but are not interesting for most of the planet.


> This seems to be highly focused on global financial news, which are unsignificant to most people on this planet.

Or perhaps they are more significant than they feel because their trickle-down effect is slow and hard to trace.


Therefore the method called "progressive enhancement" might be an option to start with an HTML-only variant and load JS only if available and required for the current page.


But who actually does that? We need billions of people doing that every day to have an effect.


How did you arrive at this number "billions"?

The equation is more like # of ppl × # of msgs in a time period = noise

We can increase the # of msgs to bring down the other side from "billions" I think.


Only tru for those european nations, who hadn't that in their national laws already.


No turning required. A bureaucrats dream was always everybody else's nightmare.

Still, it is disturbing to watch all of Orwell's ideas getting implemented in real life


Because the European Commission is not a democratic institutionen! Those bureaucrats are mostly announced, not elected. And each European nation is only sending those politicians into the Commission, that are unwanted in national politics.

In other words: The European Commission is the autocratic reservoir for conservative politicians that were to extremistic for national audiences.


If you really think that those guys are extremists, then you haven't seen nothing yet.

Take a peek over to Italian politics and you get a glimpse of what could be coming.

Or Israel.


Politicians are sent to Brussels as a reward, not as a form of exile. Those who are most compliant, lacking in initiative, devoid of original ideas, are sent there, after a career in national politics. They're not unwanted, and they're not conservative. They are just obedient non-entities.


Is this real? This sounds like a weird trip back into medieval times. Who is the head of that modern Inquisition?


What sounds like a trip into medieval times? Government control over corporations? Corporation oversight over private lives? Isn’t that what the new generation of enlightened and progressive people wanted?


But wait, isn't that what was happening in medieval times: the church ruled over the peasants, the kings ruled over the states and everyone was happy living in a liberal and free world - well at least they believed that.


That was the theory; in practice, the very limited communication (hard to handle fast-evolving situations when couriers from Rome to Amiens take a few weeks at best) & enforcement means (you have 100 guys with spears? We are 200 with pitchforks, come get us) led to a much more decentralized power structure than what is stereotypically understood.


http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/02/decentralization-...

Relatively more liberal than the Roman era and more decentralized than our current era.


Is this an April fools joke? You compile Coffeescript to Typescript to JavaScript to bytecode.

What problem ist actually solved by being able to compile pseudo-languages like Coffeescript or Typescript into each other?


I used to use CoffeeScript because the syntax was more convenient. I could do the same thing with less code. Less code can mean less maintenance (although some people have said CoffeeScript can overdo this...)

Now I use TypeScript to get the benefit of type-checking. It really helps catch silly little mistakes.

I would use Civet just to be able to use the new pipe operator syntax.

There are even compilers that compile future versions of JS into the current version of JS so future language features can be used in current browsers.

I've heard JS is the new assembly language.


The real joke, I guess, is that hundreds of people are talking about this.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: