my starting point was Google People Management Essentials. I was thinking about team-level politics at work, and noticed some ideas seemed relevant to how teams in orgs can adopt agents. I pursued that idea more widely with other resources and it resonated.
I don't think I have any conclusions to share, just the orientation: to identify and actively accommodate the tool's cognitive style in the same way we do for one another's.
your suggestion is to treat it like a person but (surprise surprise) you don't have any specific ideas of how and why that works. your idea just sounds like marketing
> your suggestion is to treat it like a person but (surprise surprise) you don't have any specific ideas of how and why that works. your idea just sounds like marketing
oh I don't think everyone has to like these tools, and I don't think everyone has to use them. I certainly don't expect everyone to use them the same way.
We use Claude Code's ability to use skills by defining a bunch of really useful and common skills that are necessary for writing software. For e.g. brainstorming, doing test driven development, or submitting a git commit.
The specific skills you linked are interesting demos of what you can do with skills! But most of them are not useful for the day to day of building software
> Note: please help, because I'd like to preserve this website forever and there's no other way to do it besides getting Claude to recreate it from a screenshot.
Why not use wget to mirror the website? Unless you're being sarcastic.
The stuff about not being able to download it is a bit of a joke and I don't think the tone landed with everybody haha. This was just an experiment to see if Claude could recreate a simple website from a screenshot, of course to your point you could download it if you wanted.
The article sums up my current frustrations with federated platforms. Maybe it just needs some time for reliable communities to be known. But until then, I'll be happy to use centralized platforms. Alternatively, people can adapt the culture of self-hosting their own instances. Then you don't have to worry about reliability and content moderation.
> It states that no one at Zerodha will lose their job if a technology implementation (AI or non-AI) directly renders their existing responsibilities and tasks obsolete.
This was just written to say that you care. You know well that when push comes to shove, they'll be laid off.
I think there will come a point, where almost everything will be automated by machines. Since we cannot just get rid of billions of people, we have to find a way to both feed the people and have something for them to do. That is unless AI takes over control of humanity. This is similar to how prisons function. They have to keep large masses of people, feed them, keep them peaceful, without expecting anything in return.
