Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | danarlow's commentslogin

From the last paragraph of the paper: “The current versions of the Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Johnson & Johnson SARS-CoV-2 vaccines encode the full-length spike S protein with two mutations (spike S-2P) that stabilize the prefusion conformation and inactivate its fusogenicity (39, 64, 67, 68). We used this same mutant form of spike S-2P as a negative control, demonstrating the complete lack of fusogenicity when two consecutive prolines were added at positions 986 and 987. However, our findings demonstrate that it will be critical to consider the fusogenic potential when designing any future vaccines in which viral fusogens are to be expressed in mammalian cells.”


So does that imply that the fusogenic potential was properly considered during the design of these three vaccines, or did we just get lucky?


The AstraZeneca vaccine uses an unchanged spike, and I'm pretty sure the Chinese, Russian, and Indian vaccines do as well.


I still can’t believe that sucralose ever passed a safety trial. When has it ever been sensible to eat chlorocarbons? It’s amazing that it took this long to find some kind of genotoxic effect.


IMO the sugar alcohol allulose[1] has crossed the uncanny valley of sweeteners. It tastes (and cooks!) almost like sucrose and it doesn’t have a weird aftertaste. Like erythritol, it is absorbed and excreted unmodified so it is nearly acaloric and doesn’t cause GI problems in reasonable doses. My only minor complaint is that, like erythritol, it causes a slight cooling sensation, so the best use cases are foods that are served chilled.

It is naturally occurring at trace levels in some fruits and was first isolated in the 1940s but commercially viable manufacturing methods only became available recently. It’s starting to appear in some low-carb bars, cereals, and ice creams, but it’s still quite hard to find in products.

The future is already here, it’s just not evenly distributed :)

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psicose


I like allulose, but the kind I tasted was both less sweet and finer than ordinary table sugar. The granularity of it was more like powdered sugar (and like the other artificial sweeteners like stevia, aspartame, xylitol, erythritol, etc) than ordinary table sugar.

To me tagatose[1] is way more like ordinary table sugar than any other sweetener that I've tried. In fact, it's indistinguishable from sugar to me. It's a real shame it's not more well known.

[1] - https://www.wired.com/2003/11/newsugar/


I came cross tagatose in this article [1] about the company Bonumose [2], which has been attempting to commercialize a production process.

Their efforts were hampered by some drama — some shady grant fraud involving a key Chinese researcher, with subsequent litigation — which is the premise of the article. But another problem with tagatose, historically, is that it's difficult to scale up the process, which requires processing yeasts with exensive enzymes, to commercial levels. Bonumose claims to have solved that problem, but it's still stuck at the patent licensing stage, from what I can tell.

[1] https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/11/1048913/inside-t...

[2] http://bonumose.com/


> doesn’t cause GI problems in reasonable doses.

GI issues is actually one of the most reported side effects of allulose. It certainly does a number on me. So much so that I ruled it out as an artificial sweetener after trying it a few times, but I guess it might still work for me as a cheap laxative.


Do you have a link to data on Glycemic Load? Even if something appears to be acaloric it can set off cascading reactions that trigger insulin production in the liver that leads to fat storage. I know this is the case for many sweeteners, and they end up being no better than sugar.


My wife has been trying Allulose over the last month or so, particularly for low carb heated foods, with fairly good luck. In particular, it makes a very good low carb+sugar free caramel that she serves frozen. We've also been using it in homemade ice creams.

We take a can of low sugar peaches or pears, mix in 2tbs of allulose and a pinch of xantham gum, freeze it and then run it through the Ninja Creami and get a quite good sorbet with 120 cal a pint, and super easy to make.

The cooling effects of some of the sugar alcohols, I'm not sure exactly which one, is pretty weird. She made some great cookies that I just wouldn't eat because of that cooling effect. Which makes them even lower calorie. :-)


>In particular, it makes a very good low carb+sugar free caramel

Does it actually remain calorie free when caramelized? That's a chemical change.


That is a good question, my wife doesn't know the answer to it. :-/


What's wrong with erythritol? For me it's already "good enough".


Erythritol is absorbed by the body before it reaches the large intestine and therefore does not make you farty. (It is subsequently excreted unmodified.)


Great, that's a nice option.


This. Keto makes fasting shockingly easy.


Keto makes eating less super easy. Insulin is such an evil hormone.


Insulin isn't evil, it's a fantastic hormone which allows us to rapidly lower excess blood glucose and store excess carbs efficiently. It allows us to recover rapidly from exercise and make use of excess food in times of plenty.


You're right. Insulin insensitivity is evil.


Keto + no dinner is extremely effective. Being in keto makes it easy to skip dinner because you never get very hungry. Skipping dinner makes it easier to be in keto because you don’t have to as strict about carbs during the rest of the day. Works like magic.


These two articles claim to debunk iron cluster-dependent magnetosensory mechanisms but not the "radical pair" mechanism described by OP.


Once you have a successful PCR, you have billions of copies of your target sequence that are easy to aerosolize and/or transfer by contact onto your pipettes, gloves, and other lab surfaces. When a few of these molecules find their way into a new PCR you just set up, you get a false positive. There are protocols clinical labs employ to avoid this (e.g. never open the cycled PCRs in same room where you set up new PCRs, etc.) but they require strict adherence. (Or you can just give up all your sensitivity and only detect the cases with a huge viral load.)


Before you jump to conclusions, here’s a relevant quote from the article:

“Although almost all coronaviruses isolated from bats have not been able to bind to the key human receptor, SHC014 is not the first that can do so. In 2013, researchers reported this ability for the first time in a different coronavirus isolated from the same bat population.

The findings reinforce suspicions that bat coronaviruses capable of directly infecting humans (rather than first needing to evolve in an intermediate animal host) may be more common than previously thought, the researchers say.”


SARS shares an enzyme that is similar enough to the HIV protease that people tried the HIV protease inhibitors on SARS and they seemed to work. This coronavirus has a very similar enzyme so it’s the same idea


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: