It could, but under the current system, candidates who are affiliated with major parties (i.e., essentially everyone who ends up winning an election) already need to win the support of their party, and the process for this is generally opaque and largely controlled by often less-moderate insiders
Also, having viable third party choices puts more pressure on larger parties to field more widely palatable candidates, or risk losing their majorities
I just think that seeing the current gerrymandered districts where I live and the crazy people who come out of the party, I would rather voters choose individuals than parties.
If someone doesn’t tow the party line, the party would immediately replace them the next year and this would give parties even more power.
As a previous Thinkpad user who moved onto Mac. I think you’re missing the appeal of the Track point and how well they were made to run something like Linux. They had better driver support and were more likely to use intel chip sets then the propriety crap that HP or Dell would sell you. Framework and the Dell XPS line eventually caught up and Linux driver support improved, but this was a huge benefit to owning a think pad.
my last job I used a mac for 10 years and missed the track point. Now, In my current job I miss the gestures from the mac book, and don’t even use the trackpoint anymore.
I don't know what this particular author has against LLMs, but a lot of people are bothered by the very intense, robots.txt ignorming, scraping of their sites.
The website being blocked by the scrapers would be a positive outcome.
Just want to point out that people have said it’s been very very hard to get Goldman Sachs to dispute a transaction, so I’m hoping that Chase will offer better service than Goldman as Goldman’s actual service is supposedly not very good.
reply