Possibly they did not want the attention of the legal departments at two very large companies given they developed GUIs that look very similar to their IP?
"My 13 year-old just updated her iPad’s system software and told me she had to read some really long thing before she could continue. She. Read. The. EULA" quote from Twitter
I understand M1 includes the most liquid portions of the money supply in circulation. When the Fed "prints" money I don't think they are talking about physical money.
"The money supply measures reflect the different degrees of liquidity—or spendability—that different types of money have. The narrowest measure, M1, is restricted to the most liquid forms of money; it consists of currency in the hands of the public; travelers checks; demand deposits, and other deposits against which checks can be written. M2 includes M1, plus savings accounts, time deposits of under $100,000, and balances in retail money market mutual funds."
The money is physical in the sense that people are able to extract value from it. It is given to a bank to loan out, essentially for free, and they are able to keep the interest.
So if you're a bank you basically are given free money by the government.
As I understand the situation from the article, Revlon is not a party to the case. It is therefore irrelevant if Revlon becomes bankrupt. Clawback provisions would not extend to a transaction between Brigade and CitiBank. IANAL