...And it will be, now that Apple has partnered with OpenAI. The foundation of OpenClaw is capable models.

> What is the logic here? Because if you can read code, I can’t imagine poking the result with black box testing being faster.

It's producing seemingly working code faster than you can closely review it.

Your car can also move faster than what you can safely control. Knowing this, why go pedal to the metal?

Are you planning to open-source it?

What are the benefits of using the codex webapp?

If you're letting it communicate with the outside world, you risk the leak and abuse of anything sensitive in the data it has access to.

s/risk/guarantee (given sufficient time)/

Yeah, Anthropic must love that people are sharing access to their entire online lives with them.

Probably more glad that people are paying subscription fees to do digital assistant stuff... without them having to directly provide the assistant interface. That way they won't be directly blamed for the wave of hacked accounts from people foolish enough to connect this to their email.

Yeah, this new trend of handing over all your keys to an AI and letting it rip looks like a horrific security nightmare, to me. I get that they're powerful tools, but they still have serious prompt-injection vulnerabilities. Not to mention that you're giving your model provider de facto access to your entire life and recorded thoughts.

Sam Altman was also recently encouraging people to give OpenAI models full access to their computing resources.

Codex has Ctrl-G to start an $EDITOR of your choice, FWIW.

This is what worries me the most. Marketing is ultimately a business of manipulation, and services like ChatGPT seem like excellent tools for manipulation. I wish OpenAI could find a less adversarial business model.