There's your trouble. The real problem is that most internet users are setting their baseline for "standard issue human writing" at exactly the level they themselves write. The problem is that more and more people do not draw a line between casual/professional writing, and as such balk at very normal professional writing as potentially AI-driven.
Blame OS developers for making it easy—SO easy!—to add all manner of special characters while typing if you wish, but the use of those characters, once they were within easy reach, grew well before AI writing became a widespread thing. If it hadn't, would AI be using it so much now?
Telling it to find directions in CarPlay but you have to say “using Google Maps” at the end. It’s pretty good for finding directions with voice only.
It is ridiculously useless for most things though. Like I’ll ask it a question on my Apple Watch and it will do a web search and give me a bunch of useless links.
the thing I find most frustrating about the music use-case is that if you ask it to play an album, then close out Siri after the confirmation bing noise, but before it finishes reading back to you the artist and album name it's about to play, then it will treat that as a cancellation and it won't play the album.
for example I say: "play comically long album title by artist on Spotify", it thinks about that for five seconds, does the bing noise, then says "playing comically long album title [special remastered edition] by artist on Spotify", and then a few seconds later starts playing the album, and if you don't wait through that whole thing it will just decide that actually you didn't want to hear the album
For some reason this confirmation is always much louder than the music you are listening to.
If you tell Siri to play some obscure artist or title of which there seem to be about 10 possible hits, then sure, we need confirmation. If I tell you to play Riders on the Storm by the The Doors, just play it damn it.
I first started hearing about it 20 years ago, and was able to confirm it for myself earlier this year. In order to truly de-stress, to let go, you need 3 weeks away. Doesn't have to be a 3 week vacation, just 3 weeks of not thinking about work.
If you can do it, I highly recommend it if for no other reason to clearly see just how much stress your work is adding to your life, even if everything seems "fine".
I say that fully acknowledging that very, very few people will get that opportunity, "unlimited" PTO or otherwise.
I got one sentence in and thought to myself, "This is about discovery, isn't it?"
And lo, complaints about plaintiffs started before I even had to scroll. If this company hadn't willy-nilly done everything they could to vacuum up the world's data, wherever it may be, however it may have been protected, then maybe they wouldn't be in this predicament.
How do you feel about Google vacuuming up the world's data when they created a search engine? I feel like everybody just ignores this because Google was ostensibly sending traffic to the resulting site. The actual infringement of scraping should be identical between OpenAI and Google. Why is nobody complaining about Google scraping their sites? Is it only because they're getting paid off to not complain?
Everybody acts like this is a moral argument when really it's about whether or not they're getting a piece of the pie.
At the time Google created a search engine, they were not showing the data themselves, they were pointing to where those are. When they started to actually print articles themselves, they got sued. Showing where the thing is and showing content of the thing are two different actions.
So, when google did the same thing, there were complains.
> Why is nobody complaining about Google scraping their sites?
And second, search engines were actually pretty gentle with their sites scrapping. They needed the sites to work, so they respected robots.txt and made sure they wont accidentally DDoS sites by too many requests. AI companies just DDoS sites, do not respect robots.txt and if you block them, they will use another from their infinite amount of IPs.
Otherwise said, even back then, Google was kind trying to be ok non evil citizen. They became sociopathic only much later and even now kind of try to hide it. OpenAI and the rest of AI companies are openly sociopathic and proud of damage they cause.
Exactly my reaction. I hate this. I hate that someone thought of it and that it exists. I have no idea if it will sell, but I was like "no way, that cannot be a real launch from Apple"
Companies can architect their backends to be able to fail back to another region in case of outage, and either don't test it or don't bother to have it in place because they can just blame Amazon, and don't otherwise have an SLA for their service.
To fix it, test your failback procedures. For everything else, there's nothing to fix, it's working by design.
> Companies can architect their backends to be able to fail back to another region in case of outage, and either don't test it or don't bother to have it in place because they can just blame Amazon, and don't otherwise have an SLA for their service.
My CI was down for 2 hours this morning, despite not even being on AWS. We have a set of credentials on that host that we call assumeRole with and push to an S3 bucket, which has a lambda that duplicates to buckets in other regions. All our IAM calls were failing due to this outage, and we have 0 items deployed in us-east-1 (we're european)
One thing that AWS should do is provide an easier way to detect these hidden dependencies. You can do that with CloudTrail if you know how to do it (filter operations by region and check that none are in us-east-1), but a more explicit service would be nice.
The problem was we couldn’t log into cloud trail, or the console at all, to identify that, because IAM identity center is single region. This was a decision recommended by AWS, and blessed by our (army of) SRE teams.
But you can run TWO identity centers in different regions for the price of one(1)! IAM IDC is just a regular application hosted on the AWS infrastructure, it really has nothing special.
The hindsight is 20/20, of course, it's a good practice to audit CloudTrail periodically for unexpected regional dependencies.
Indeed. I also noticed this morning that you're not the person I replied to, and I took your response (which was actually helpful) in the context of the original post which was "people are happy to just blame AWS when they're down".
Either way, we would have only made it one step farther in our CI, as the next step is to build a conatiner with a base image from docker hub, and that was down too. The idea of running a multi region nexus repository to avoid Docker hub outages for my 14 person engineering team seems slightly overkill!
The easiest way to provide some resilience to the build process is to add a pull-through cache using AWS ECR. It might backfire due to egress costs, though, if you're building outside the AWS infrastructure.
It's actually an interesting exercise to enumerate _all_ the external dependencies. But yeah, avoiding them all seems to be less than helpful for the vast majority of users.
I tried that, but this completely removes the transparency, and some apps look even worse and harder to visualise as it’s not designed to not have the transparency on iOS 26.
This could be significant improvement if Apple let us choose the transparency percentage.
It makes some things better. But it also replaces transparency in some apps with just a solid block of colour. Photos you lose like 10-20% of the screen. The UI used to fit and work well and they just broke it. Maddening.
There's your trouble. The real problem is that most internet users are setting their baseline for "standard issue human writing" at exactly the level they themselves write. The problem is that more and more people do not draw a line between casual/professional writing, and as such balk at very normal professional writing as potentially AI-driven.
Blame OS developers for making it easy—SO easy!—to add all manner of special characters while typing if you wish, but the use of those characters, once they were within easy reach, grew well before AI writing became a widespread thing. If it hadn't, would AI be using it so much now?
reply